California Privacy Coalition · Now Reviewing Cases
Takes about 60 seconds. No account or login required.
Step 1 of 5
If you visited Talkspace.com in California and started a therapy, teen therapy, couples therapy, or psychiatry intake questionnaire — but never created an account — the information you typed may have been sent to third-party trackers before you ever agreed to anything.
What Happened
To reach someone for therapy or psychiatric care, Talkspace's website asked visitors to answer detailed questions about their mental health, relationships, and reasons for seeking help — often before any account existed and before any privacy consent was clearly given.
Talkspace's public intake flow for therapy, teen therapy, couples therapy, and psychiatry asks visitors to describe their symptoms, relationship status, and reasons for seeking care — sometimes including information about a minor — before an account is ever created.
Plaintiffs in related litigation have alleged that Talkspace's website ran third-party tracking tools — including advertising and analytics pixels — capable of capturing page activity and form interactions in real time as visitors moved through the intake flow.
The claim is not that tracking tools exist — most websites use them. It's that visitors weren't given clear, specific notice that answers to sensitive mental-health questions could be transmitted to outside companies before they ever agreed to Talkspace's terms.
Because these visitors never created an account, they never agreed to Talkspace's arbitration clause or class-action waiver — which means their claims, unlike those of paying members, are not automatically routed out of court.
Is Your Situation Covered?
And started an intake or assessment questionnaire for therapy, teen therapy, couples therapy, or psychiatry.
At the time you visited the site and interacted with the intake form.
You left before signing up for a plan or beginning treatment through Talkspace.
So the coalition's reviewing counsel can confirm the details of your visit.
Already a Talkspace member who received treatment? This specific coalition isn't able to represent current or former paying members, because signing up bound you to Talkspace's arbitration agreement and class-action waiver. A different process applies to those claims.
What The Law Allows
Claims like this are typically brought under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), a statute with fixed statutory damages set by the legislature — not damages you have to calculate or prove yourself.
$5,000
The statutory damages figure under California Penal Code §637.2 for qualifying CIPA violations, without a separate requirement to prove actual financial harm.
$0
Reviewing counsel works on contingency. You pay nothing to submit your information, and nothing unless your claim results in a recovery.
1,500+
Reflects the broader wave of CIPA tracking-technology litigation against websites in health, finance, and consumer sectors over the past 18 months.
Courts are currently divided on how CIPA applies to website tracking technology, and outcomes vary by theory and by court. Past results in other cases do not predict the outcome of any individual claim. This is general information, not legal advice — consult an attorney about the specifics of your situation.
Case Developments
A summary of relevant court activity in Talkspace-related privacy litigation and comparable tracking-technology cases. Updated as developments occur.
A federal court considering a prior CIPA claim against Talkspace dismissed the "pen register / trap and trace" theory, finding that pixel-based tracking did not meet that specific statutory definition. That ruling addressed one narrow CIPA theory; it did not resolve separate wiretapping claims under Penal Code §631, which several other courts have allowed to proceed against similar tracking technology.
A Southern District of California court held that allegations of tracking pixels capturing personal data, including IP addresses, were sufficient to state a CIPA claim, rejecting the defense argument that a footer-linked privacy policy alone constituted valid consent.
A federal court allowed CIPA wiretapping claims to proceed against online services that used Meta Pixel to transmit user activity, including sensitive form data, to Meta without adequately disclosed consent — a fact pattern comparable to health-intake tracking claims.
This is a summary of public court activity for informational purposes and is not a guarantee of how any individual claim, including yours, will be evaluated or resolved.
What To Expect
The form above confirms you started a qualifying Talkspace intake form in California and never created an account, then collects the contact details counsel needs to reach you.
The coalition's reviewing counsel evaluates the details of your visit and confirms whether your claim fits the coalition's criteria.
If your case is accepted, you'll be contacted about formal retainer paperwork before any action is filed on your behalf. You pay nothing unless you recover.
Questions
Yes — that's actually the group this coalition is focused on. People who created accounts agreed to Talkspace's arbitration clause and class-action waiver when they accepted its Terms of Service. People who only interacted with the public intake form did not.
You don't need to know that on your own. Reviewing counsel evaluates the technical details of your claim after you submit your information — you just need to confirm you visited the site and started a qualifying intake form while in California.
No. Submitting your information authorizes review of your potential claim. It does not, by itself, create an attorney-client relationship. If your case is accepted, you'll be presented with a formal retainer before any legal action is taken.
Nothing to submit your information, and nothing unless your claim results in a recovery. Reviewing counsel works on a contingency basis.
The legal theory relies on the California Invasion of Privacy Act, a state statute that applies to activity involving California residents. It doesn't extend to visitors located in other states.
Your information is reviewed by the coalition's reviewing counsel — an experienced law firm that evaluates claims submitted through this coalition. You will not need to deal with attorneys directly to submit your initial information; the coalition manages that process.
No account, no login, and no cost to check.
Start My Free Case Review